ReviewCureus2024
Sepsis in Aging Populations: A Review of Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Management.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Predictive Value of C-Reactive Protein-Albumin-Lymphocyte Index for Multiple Organ Failure Syndrome in Elderly Patients with Sepsis.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- Epidemiology and outcomes of adult (non-maternity) community-onset sepsis in Ireland: a secondary analysis of acute hospital administrative data 2020-2024.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Multi-omics insights into immunometabolic dysregulation in neonatal sepsis for precision medicine.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- ASP-COMPLEX: redefining antimicrobial stewardship to improve outcomes in high-risk patients with severe infections.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026Review
- Age-related differences and common pathways of lymphocyte subsets in sepsis: a comparative review of elderly and pediatric patients.Cell death & disease · 2026Review
- Diagnosing Sepsis in Primary Care: Navigating Clinical Uncertainty Across Vulnerable Patient Groups.Cureus · 2026Review
- Temporal patterns in diabetes and sepsis mortality in older Americans: a population-based analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Risk Factors and Predictive Value of Sepsis in Patients with Liver Abscess.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Exploring the optimal range of blood pressure in elderly sepsis patients: a retrospective cohort study based on MIMIC-IV data.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis remains a significant global health concern, particularly among aging populations. This comprehensive review examines the complex interplay between aging and sepsis, focusing on risk factors, diagnostic challenges, and management strategies specific to older adults. The study explores the physiological changes associated with aging that contribute to increased sepsis susceptibility, including immunosenescence and chronic inflammation. It delves into the unique pathophysiology of sepsis in the elderly, highlighting the role of comorbidities and age-related immune dysfunction. The review emphasizes the importance of early recognition and tailored interventions for sepsis in older patients, addressing the often atypical presentation of symptoms in this population. By synthesizing current research and clinical guidelines, this study aims to enhance understanding of sepsis in aging populations and improve outcomes through targeted prevention, prompt diagnosis, and effective management strategies. The findings underscore the need for age-specific approaches in sepsis care and highlight areas for future research to address the growing burden of sepsis in an aging global population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.