ArticleCureus2024
Association of Vitamin D and Prostate Health Status in Men: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a discrimination model for benign prostatic hyperplasia: key influencing factors, interaction effects, and the protective role of g-tocopherol.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Retrospective analysis of micronutrient status and prostate health: linking serum zinc, selenium, and vitamin D levels to prostate-specific antigen and urinary tract function.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common form of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Vitamin D may be an effective way to treat BPH symptoms because it has anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory characteristics. Thus, adequate vitamin D levels are vital for overall health. This study aimed to investigate the association of vitamin D with prostate health status in men and determine the diagnostic cut-off of vitamin D levels. Methods: This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among men between 45 and 80 years of age who presented to the surgery or urology department with complaints of frequent urination and urinary tract infection. Based on their total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, the participants were categorized into four groups - Group A (total PSA 0-3.9 ng/ml), Group B (total PSA 4-9.9 ng/ml), Group C (total PSA 10 - 19.9 ng/ml), and Group D (total PSA > 20 ng/ml). Total PSA was estimated by a dedicated Beckman Coulter hormone analyzer (UNICEL DXI 600, Beckman Coulter, Inc., California, US) via the chemiluminescence method. Serum vitamin D was estimated with dedicated reagents in the Bio-Rad ELISA (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., California, US). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) post hoc test was utilized to compare quantitative variables. A correlation analysis proved the relation between vitamin D and total PSA. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to determine the diagnostic performance of the analyte of interest.
resultsIn this study, total PSA levels significantly increased in men over 75 years of age. The upper limit of total PSA increased with the age of the men. Total PSA levels were compared between the age groups of 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and more than 70, and an increase in total PSA levels was observed in those between 60 and 69 years. Total PSA levels were also negatively correlated (r=- 0.31) with vitamin D in this age group. Moreover, vitamin D-deficient individuals had significantly increased total PSA levels (12.57±5.22 ng/ml). Further correlation analysis revealed a significant negative correlation of total PSA with vitamin D levels (r=- 0.245; p=0.022). ROC analysis had an area under the curve of 0.828 for Vitamin D at a cut-off of 20 ng/ml revealing a diagnostic sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 60%. Conclusion: Vitamin D deficiency is a potential biochemical marker of benign prostate hypertrophy. Vitamin D and total PSA are indicators of prostate health status in men. Screening of total PSA levels reflects the prostate health status of men and this needs to be potentiated with vitamin D supplementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.