Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39744215›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024

Deep learning-based automation for segmentation and biometric measurement of the gestational sac in ultrasound images.

Hafiz Muhammad Danish, Zobia Suhail, Faiza Farooq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hafiz Muhammad DanishDepartment of Computer Science, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Zobia SuhailDepartment of Computer Science, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Faiza FarooqDepartment of Radiology, University of Lahore Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Monitoring the morphological features of the gestational sac (GS) and measuring the mean sac diameter (MSD) during early pregnancy are essential for predicting spontaneous miscarriage and estimating gestational age (GA). However, the manual process is labor-intensive and highly dependent on the sonographer's expertise. This study aims to develop an automated pipeline to assist sonographers in accurately segmenting the GS and estimating GA. Methods: A novel dataset of 500 ultrasound (US) scans, taken between 4 and 10 weeks of gestation, was prepared. Four widely used fully convolutional neural networks: UNet, UNet++, DeepLabV3, and ResUNet were modified by replacing their encoders with a pre-trained ResNet50. These models were trained and evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation to identify the optimal approach for GS segmentation. Subsequently, novel biometry was introduced to assess GA automatically, and the system's performance was compared with that of sonographers. Results: The ResUNet model demonstrated the best performance among the tested architectures, achieving mean Intersection over Union (IoU), Dice, Recall, and Precision values of 0.946, 0.978, 0.987, and 0.958, respectively. The discrepancy between the GA estimations provided by the sonographers and the biometry algorithm was measured at a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.07 weeks. Conclusion: The proposed pipeline offers a precise and reliable alternative to conventional manual measurements for GS segmentation and GA estimation. Furthermore, its potential extends to segmenting and measuring other fetal components in future studies.

Indexed as

automatic segmentationdeep learningearly pregnancyfetal biometrygestational sacultrasound images

Identifiers

PMID39744215
PMCPMC11688376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.