ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Deep learning-based automation for segmentation and biometric measurement of the gestational sac in ultrasound images.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Monitoring the morphological features of the gestational sac (GS) and measuring the mean sac diameter (MSD) during early pregnancy are essential for predicting spontaneous miscarriage and estimating gestational age (GA). However, the manual process is labor-intensive and highly dependent on the sonographer's expertise. This study aims to develop an automated pipeline to assist sonographers in accurately segmenting the GS and estimating GA. Methods: A novel dataset of 500 ultrasound (US) scans, taken between 4 and 10 weeks of gestation, was prepared. Four widely used fully convolutional neural networks: UNet, UNet++, DeepLabV3, and ResUNet were modified by replacing their encoders with a pre-trained ResNet50. These models were trained and evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation to identify the optimal approach for GS segmentation. Subsequently, novel biometry was introduced to assess GA automatically, and the system's performance was compared with that of sonographers. Results: The ResUNet model demonstrated the best performance among the tested architectures, achieving mean Intersection over Union (IoU), Dice, Recall, and Precision values of 0.946, 0.978, 0.987, and 0.958, respectively. The discrepancy between the GA estimations provided by the sonographers and the biometry algorithm was measured at a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.07 weeks. Conclusion: The proposed pipeline offers a precise and reliable alternative to conventional manual measurements for GS segmentation and GA estimation. Furthermore, its potential extends to segmenting and measuring other fetal components in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.