ReviewJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2024
Effect of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on mortality rate of aluminum phosphate poisoning: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reversible Atrial Fibrillation and Cardiogenic Shock Following Acute Aluminum Phosphide Poisoning: A Case Report and Literature Review.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2026Article
- Neurological Manifestations of Aluminum Phosphide (Wheat-Pill/Rice-Pill) Poisoning: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aluminum phosphate (ALP) poisoning has a high mortality rate (MR) secondary to cardiogenic shock. Recently, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) showed a successful result in this issue. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the MR of patients with ALP poisoning who underwent ECMO versus those with conventional treatment. Materials and Methods: Two parallel databases' reviews were done to find the ECMO treatment-applied studies or conventional treatment-applied studies according to the PRISMA protocol. All studies in any languages and English conference abstracts were included for ECMO treatment-applied studies. Only English-language human observational studies, which reported MR, were included in conventional treatment-applied studies. All ETAS case reports were summarized and used as a newly generated cross-sectional study (NGCSS) for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Results: Out of 167 and 1043 records, 17 case reports (24 cases), 3 cross-sectional studies, and 9 conventional treatment-applied studies were selected. In meta-analysis NGCSS applied as the fourth cross-sectional ECMO treatment-applied studies. The overall MR of ECMO-treated cases (23% [95% confidence interval (CI): 7%-39%]) was significantly less than conventionally treated cases (60% [95% CI: 39%-63%]; Conclusion: ECMO reduced the MR of ALP-poisoned patients; however, it is a highly invasive and complicated procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.