Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39744182›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2024

A systematic review of the association between insulin resistance surrogate indices and bone mineral density.

Amirhossein Shirinezhad, Alireza Azarboo, Amirhossein Ghaseminejad-Raeini, Fatemeh Kanaani Nejad, Negar Zareshahi, Sheyda Mohtasham Amiri, Yasamin Tahmasebi, Amir Human Hoveidaei

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amirhossein ShirinezhadSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza AzarbooSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amirhossein Ghaseminejad-RaeiniSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh Kanaani NejadMedical Imaging Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Negar ZareshahiSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sheyda Mohtasham AmiriDepartment of Medicine, Islamic Azad University Tehran Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Yasamin TahmasebiSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Human HoveidaeiSports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The relationship of insulin resistance with bone mineral density (BMD) remains unclear, offering an opportunity for novel indices to shed light on the matter. The aim of this review was to evaluate the association between surrogate indices of insulin resistance and BMD. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to evaluate observational studies that examined the relationship between insulin resistance surrogate indices and BMD in adults. Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase were searched. Quality assessment was performed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools. Results: This systematic review included 27 cohorts and cross-sectional studies with 71,525 participants to assess the potential link between insulin resistance surrogate indices like HOMA-IR, HOMA-β, TyG, TyG-BMI, TyG-WtHR, and TyG-WC, along with METS-IR, and VAI, and BMD at various sites. There seems to be no link between BMD and the HOMA index, despite being extensively studied in various studies (adjusted β ranging from -0.49 to 0.103). Most literature suggests that a higher TyG index is associated with decreased BMD levels (adjusted β ranging from -0.085 to 0.0124). Despite limited evidence, other insulin resistance indices such as VAI (adjusted β ranging from 0.007 to 0.016), TyG-BMI (adjusted β ranging from 0.002 to 0.415), METS-IR (adjusted β ranging from 0.005 to 0.060), TyG-WtHR (β = 0.012) and TyG-WC (β = 0.0001) have shown a positive association with BMD in a few studies. Conclusion: This systematic review emphasizes the intricate connection between insulin resistance and BMD. The lack of ability to perform a meta-analysis and the dependence on cross-sectional studies hinder the robustness of the findings, hence necessitating well-designed longitudinal studies. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024512770.

Indexed as

Bone DensityInsulin ResistanceBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesHumansBiomarkersBMDbone mineral densityHOMA-IRinsulin resistanceosteoporosissystematic reviewTyG indexVAI

Identifiers

PMID39744182
PMCPMC11688183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.