ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Development and validation of a programmed cell death index to predict the prognosis and drug sensitivity of gastric cancer.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A prognostic nomogram utilized lymph node ratio for signet ring cell gastric cancer patients post-surgery.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Programmed cell death (PCD) critically influences the tumor microenvironment (TME) and is intricately linked to tumor progression and patient prognosis. This study aimed to develop a novel prognostic indicator and marker of drug sensitivity in patients with gastric cancer (GC) based on PCD. Methods: We analyzed genes associated with 14 distinct PCD patterns using bulk transcriptome data and clinical information from TCGA-STAD for model construction with univariate Cox regression and LASSO regression analyses. Microarray data from GSE62254, GSE15459, and GSE26901 were used for validation. Single-cell transcriptome data from GSE183904 were analyzed to explore the relationship between TME and the newly constructed model, named PCD index (PCDI). Drug sensitivity comparisons were made between patients with high and low PCDI scores. Results: We developed a novel twelve-gene signature called PCDI. Upon validation, GC patients with higher PCDI scores had poorer prognoses. A high-performance nomogram integrating the PCDI with clinical features was also established. Additionally, single-cell transcriptome data analysis suggested that PCDI might be linked to critical components of the TME. Patients with high PCDI scores exhibited resistance to standard adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy but might benefit from targeted treatments with NU7441, Dasatinib, and JQ1. Conclusion: The novel PCDI model shows significant potential in predicting clinical prognosis and drug sensitivity of GC, thereby facilitating personalized treatment strategies for patients with GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.