SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2024
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction of an actin cytoskeleton-related gene signature for predicting prognosis and therapeutic response in glioblastoma: based on machine learning.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Article
- p53 Pathway-Targeted Therapeutic Strategies in Glioblastoma: A CNS-Specific Framework Integrating Therapeutic Resistance, Molecular Stratification, CNS Pharmacology, and Clinical Translation.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- High frequency and prognostic significance of TP53 promoter methylation in Pakistani glioblastoma patients.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Utility of Intratumoral Susceptibility Signals in Adult Diffuse Gliomas: Tumor Grade Prediction and Correlation with Molecular Markers Within the WHO CNS5 (2021) Classification.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Prognostic impact ofFrontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the relationship between somatic Methods: We included longitudinal studies and clinical trials involving a minimum of 40 adult participants diagnosed with supratentorial glioblastoma, wherein the status of Results and conclusion: This study encompassed 23 papers involving 2,555 patients, out of which 716 had reported oncogenic variants. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021289496.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.