ReviewmLife2024
Protein engineering in the deep learning era.
Review in mLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diffusion-Based Protein Structure Design: Geometric Modelling, Validation Strategies, and Thermodynamic Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and automation in enzyme engineering: evolution, advances, and future perspectives.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2026Review
- Sequence-only prediction of binding affinity changes: a robust and interpretable model for antibody engineering.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- From high-throughput evaluation to wet-lab studies: advancing mutation effect prediction with a retrieval-enhanced model.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Semantical and geometrical protein encoding toward enhanced bioactivity and thermostability.eLife · 2025Article
- Protein engineering in the deep learning era.mLife · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in deep learning have significantly aided protein engineering in addressing challenges in industrial production, healthcare, and environmental sustainability. This review frames frequently researched problems in protein understanding and engineering from the perspective of deep learning. It provides a thorough discussion of representation methods for protein sequences and structures, along with general encoding pipelines that support both pre-training and supervised learning tasks. We summarize state-of-the-art protein language models, geometric deep learning techniques, and the combination of distinct approaches to learning from multi-modal biological data. Additionally, we outline common downstream tasks and relevant benchmark datasets for training and evaluating deep learning models, focusing on satisfying the particular needs of protein engineering applications, such as identifying mutation sites and predicting properties for candidates' virtual screening. This review offers biologists the latest tools for assisting their engineering projects while providing a clear and comprehensive guide for computer scientists to develop more powerful solutions by standardizing problem formulation and consolidating data resources. Future research can foresee a deeper integration of the communities of biology and computer science, unleashing the full potential of deep learning in protein engineering and driving new scientific breakthroughs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.