ArticleBJUI compass2024
Early oncological outcomes of delayed radical prostatectomy: A prospective, international, follow-up analysis of the COVIDSurg-Cancer study.
Article in BJUI compass, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Biopsy-to-Radical Prostatectomy Interval on Adverse Pathological Outcomes in High-Risk Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- What has the COVID-19 pandemic taught us about safety of surgical wait times in urological oncology?BJU international · 2025Review
- Early oncological outcomes of delayed radical prostatectomy: A prospective, international, follow-up analysis of the COVIDSurg-Cancer study.BJUI compass · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare the early oncological outcomes of delayed (>90 days) versus scheduled (≤90 days) radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients and methods: Patients with prostate cancer due to undergo surgery between March 2020 and June 2020 who were enrolled in the COVIDSurg-Cancer international, observational study were prospectively followed up for 1 year. Time to surgery was defined as the difference between the operation date and the multi-disciplinary team decision to offer surgery. The primary outcome was the positive surgical margin (PSM) rate. Biochemical recurrence (BCR), upgradation and upstaging were secondary oncological outcomes. The Independent Results: Four hundred seventy-six (78.7%) patients underwent RP from 605 that were eligible. Three hundred seven (64.5%) patients underwent scheduled RP, and 169 (35.5%) underwent delayed RP. A small proportion of men ( Conclusion: High-risk men were prioritised for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our prospective data support previous retrospective, cancer-registry evidence suggesting no adverse oncological impact after delaying RP across all risk groups. Our study is limited by the short follow-up period, and therefore, longer term conclusions cannot be drawn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.