Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39744070›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2024

Targeted microwave ablation of localised prostate cancer: Initial results of VIOLETTE trial.

Nicolas Barry Delongchamps, Alexandre Peltier, Eric Potiron, Franck Bladou, Julien Anract, Romain Diamand, Grégoire Robert, Aurel Messas, Roland Van Velthoven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. MR Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy and Primary Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicolas Barry DelongchampsDepartment of Urology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris Université Paris Cité Paris France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5827-9567
Alexandre PeltierDepartment of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium.
Eric PotironDepartment of Urology Clinique Urologique Nantes Atlantis Saint Herblain France.
Franck BladouDepartment of Urology, CHU de Bordeaux Université de Bordeaux Bordeaux France.
Julien AnractDepartment of Urology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris Université Paris Cité Paris France.
Romain DiamandDepartment of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium.
Grégoire RobertDepartment of Urology, CHU de Bordeaux Université de Bordeaux Bordeaux France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5249-8689
Aurel MessasDepartment of Urology American Hospital Paris France.
Roland Van VelthovenDepartment of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the precision and safety of targeted microwave ablation (TMA) using organ-based tracking (OBT) fusion, in patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer. Patients and method: We conducted a prospective, multicentric trial. Eligible patients had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 20 ng/mL, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible index tumour of Gleason score 3 + 4, with largest axis ≤15 mm and distant of at least 5 mm from the rectum and apex. TMA was performed with microwave needle applicator using OBT fusion, with a transperineal or a transrectal approach. In this interim analysis, we evaluated precision, safety, urinary and sexual outcomes, and PSA density kinetics. Results: At this point, 37 patients were treated in five centres. Median (interquartile range) age is 68 (63-72) years. Baseline median prostate volume and PSA are of 45 (34-57) mL and 8 (6.2-10.8) ng/mL, respectively. Median largest tumour axis on T2W MRI is of 11 mm (10-13). Patients were treated under general anaesthesia or conscious IV sedation in an outpatient setting. Anaesthesia had a median duration of 78 (66-90) min. A median number of 3 (2-4) 12-W ablations of 2 to 5 min were performed per patient. After a median follow-up of 6 (2.4-10) months, we observed 58 adverse events (AE) in 22 patients. These were of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 1, 2 and 3 in 43 (74%), 13 (22%) and 2 (4%) cases. Six (15%) patients had an acute urinary retention, five of which considered as severe AE because of rehospitalisation. We did not observe any significant difference in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-ejaculatory dysfunction (MSHQ-EjD) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF5) from baseline to last follow-up. Median PSA density evolved from 0.2 (0.1-0.3) at baseline to 0.1 (0.07-0.16) at 12 months. Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that TMA using OBT fusion is precise and safe in patients with intermediate risk localised prostate cancer. Further inclusions and follow-up are needed to assess oncological outcome.

Indexed as

cancerfocal therapymicrowaveorgan‐based trackingprostate

Identifiers

PMID39744070
PMCPMC11685167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.