Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39744045›Full record

ArticleRadiology advances2022

Estimating time-to-total knee replacement on radiographs and MRI: a multimodal approach using self-supervised deep learning.

Ozkan Cigdem, Shengjia Chen, Chaojie Zhang, Kyunghyun Cho, Richard Kijowski, Cem M Deniz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Advances in deep learning multimodal fusion for early diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ozkan CigdemDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4356-6277
Shengjia ChenDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1556-0679
Chaojie ZhangDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0229-4196
Kyunghyun ChoCenter of Data Science, New York University, New York, NY 10011, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1669-3211
Richard KijowskiDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Cem M DenizDepartment of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8809-5945

Funding

Deep Learning-based Imaging Biomarkers for Knee OsteoarthritisR01AR074453 · NIAMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DENIZ, CEM MURAT · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Accurately predicting the expected duration of time until total knee replacement (time-to-TKR) is crucial for patient management and health care planning. Predicting when surgery may be needed, especially within shorter windows like 3 years, allows clinicians to plan timely interventions and health care systems to allocate resources more effectively. Existing models lack the precision for such time-based predictions. A survival analysis model for predicting time-to-TKR was developed using features from medical images and clinical measurements. Methods: From the Osteoarthritis Initiative dataset, all knees with clinical variables, MRI scans, radiographs, and quantitative and semiquantitative assessments from images were identified. This resulted in 895 knees that underwent TKR within the 9-year follow-up period, as specified by the Osteoarthritis Initiative study design, and 786 control knees that did not undergo TKR (right-censored, indicating their status beyond the 9-year follow-up is unknown). These knees were used for model training and testing. Additionally, 518 and 164 subjects from the Multi-Center Osteoarthritis Study and internal hospital data were used for external testing, respectively. Deep learning models were utilized to extract features from radiographs and MR scans. Extracted features, clinical variables, and image assessments were used in survival analysis with Lasso Cox feature selection and a random survival forest model to predict time-to-TKR. Results: The proposed model exhibited strong discrimination power by integrating self-supervised deep learning features with clinical variables (eg, age, body mass index, pain score) and image assessment measurements (eg, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, joint space narrowing, bone marrow lesion size, cartilage morphology) from multiple modalities. The model achieved an area under the curve of 94.5 (95% CI, 94.0-95.1) for predicting the time-to-TKR. Conclusions: The proposed model demonstrated the potential of self-supervised learning and multimodal data fusion in accurately predicting time-to-TKR that may assist physicians to develop personalize treatment strategies.

Indexed as

deep learningknee osteoarthritismultimodal learningself-supervised learningtime-to-TKR prediction

Identifiers

PMID39744045
PMCPMC11687945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.