Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39744035›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Transformers deep learning models for missing data imputation: an application of the ReMasker model on a psychometric scale.

Monica Casella, Nicola Milano, Pasquale Dolce, Davide Marocco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Monica CasellaNatural and Artificial Cognition Laboratory, Department of Humanistic Studies, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Nicola MilanoNatural and Artificial Cognition Laboratory, Department of Humanistic Studies, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Pasquale DolceDepartment of Translational Medical Science, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Davide MaroccoNatural and Artificial Cognition Laboratory, Department of Humanistic Studies, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Missing data in psychometric research presents a substantial challenge, impacting the reliability and validity of study outcomes. Various factors contribute to this issue, including participant non-response, dropout, or technical errors during data collection. Traditional methods like mean imputation or regression, commonly used to handle missing data, rely upon assumptions that may not hold on psychological data and can lead to distorted results. Methods: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of transformer-based deep learning for missing data imputation, comparing ReMasker, a masking autoencoding transformer model, with conventional imputation techniques (mean and median imputation, Expectation-Maximization algorithm) and machine learning approaches (K-nearest neighbors, MissForest, and an Artificial Neural Network). A psychometric dataset from the COVID distress repository was used, with imputation performance assessed through the Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) between the original and imputed data matrices. Results: Results indicate that machine learning techniques, particularly ReMasker, achieve superior performance in terms of reconstruction error compared to conventional imputation techniques across all tested scenarios. Discussion: This finding underscores the potential of transformer-based models to provide robust imputation in psychometric research, enhancing data integrity and generalizability.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningmachine learningmissing datapsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID39744035
PMCPMC11688576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.