ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
Transformers deep learning models for missing data imputation: an application of the ReMasker model on a psychometric scale.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformer-based multimodal model for estimation of appendicular lean mass using incomplete chest radiographs and electronic health record.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Bayesian LSTM-Based Missing Data Estimation and Flexural Strength Assessment for Determination of Novel Smart Mobility Pavement Materials: Mg(OH)Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Missing data in psychometric research presents a substantial challenge, impacting the reliability and validity of study outcomes. Various factors contribute to this issue, including participant non-response, dropout, or technical errors during data collection. Traditional methods like mean imputation or regression, commonly used to handle missing data, rely upon assumptions that may not hold on psychological data and can lead to distorted results. Methods: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of transformer-based deep learning for missing data imputation, comparing ReMasker, a masking autoencoding transformer model, with conventional imputation techniques (mean and median imputation, Expectation-Maximization algorithm) and machine learning approaches (K-nearest neighbors, MissForest, and an Artificial Neural Network). A psychometric dataset from the COVID distress repository was used, with imputation performance assessed through the Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) between the original and imputed data matrices. Results: Results indicate that machine learning techniques, particularly ReMasker, achieve superior performance in terms of reconstruction error compared to conventional imputation techniques across all tested scenarios. Discussion: This finding underscores the potential of transformer-based models to provide robust imputation in psychometric research, enhancing data integrity and generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.