Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39744033›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Assessing serial recall as a measure of artificial grammar learning.

Holly E Jenkins, Ysanne de Graaf, Faye Smith, Nick Riches, Benjamin Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Holly E JenkinsDepartment of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ysanne de GraafFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Faye SmithSchool of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Nick RichesSchool of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Benjamin WilsonDepartment of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Implicit statistical learning is, by definition, learning that occurs without conscious awareness. However, measures that putatively assess implicit statistical learning often require explicit reflection, for example, deciding if a sequence is 'grammatical' or 'ungrammatical'. By contrast, 'processing-based' tasks can measure learning without requiring conscious reflection, by measuring processes that are facilitated by implicit statistical learning. For example, when multiple stimuli consistently co-occur, it is efficient to 'chunk' them into a single cognitive unit, thus reducing working memory demands. Previous research has shown that when sequences of phonemes can be chunked into 'words', participants are better able to recall these sequences than random ones. Here, in two experiments, we investigated whether serial visual recall could be used to effectively measure the learning of a more complex artificial grammar that is designed to emulate the between-word relationships found in language. Methods: We adapted the design of a previous Artificial Grammar Learning (AGL) study to use a visual serial recall task, as well as more traditional reflection-based grammaticality judgement and sequence completion tasks. After exposure to "grammatical" sequences of visual symbols generated by the artificial grammar, the participants were presented with novel testing sequences. After a brief pause, participants were asked to recall the sequence by clicking on the visual symbols on the screen in order. Results: In both experiments, we found no evidence of artificial grammar learning in the Visual Serial Recall task. However, we did replicate previously reported learning effects in the reflection-based measures. Discussion: In light of the success of serial recall tasks in previous experiments, we discuss several methodological factors that influence the extent to which implicit statistical learning can be measured using these tasks.

Indexed as

artificial grammar learningchunkingimplicit learningrecallsequence learningstatistical learning

Identifiers

PMID39744033
PMCPMC11688649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.