Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39743655›Full record

ArticleOdontology2025

Do instrument kinematics and the apical preparation limit influence canal disinfection and bacterial extrusion?

Taynara Santos Goulart, Maick Meneguzzo Prado, Giulia Celine Tieppo, Bruna Venzke Fischer, Daniela Peressoni Vieira Schuldt, Beatriz Serrato Coelho, Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi, Cleonice da Silveira Teixeira, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia, Josiane de Almeida

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Taynara Santos GoulartDepartment of Dentistry - Endodontics Division, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Campus Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, 88040-900, Brazil.
Maick Meneguzzo PradoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Giulia Celine TieppoDepartment of Endodontics, University of Southern Santa Catarina (UNISUL), Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Bruna Venzke FischerDepartment of Dentistry - Endodontics Division, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Campus Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, 88040-900, Brazil.
Daniela Peressoni Vieira SchuldtDepartment of Endodontics, College of Dental Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Clearwater, FL, USA.
Beatriz Serrato CoelhoDepartment of Endodontics, University of Southern Santa Catarina (UNISUL), Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Eduardo Antunes BortoluzziDepartment of Diagnosis and Oral Health - Endodontics Division, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Cleonice da Silveira TeixeiraDepartment of Dentistry - Endodontics Division, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Campus Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, 88040-900, Brazil.
Lucas da Fonseca Roberti GarciaDepartment of Dentistry - Endodontics Division, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Campus Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, 88040-900, Brazil. drlucas.garcia@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8724-0124
Josiane de AlmeidaDepartment of Endodontics, University of Southern Santa Catarina (UNISUL), Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

Funding

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 117577/2019-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This in vitro research assessed the influence of the instrument kinematics (rotary and reciprocating) and the apical preparation limit on the root canal disinfection and apical bacterial extrusion. After 21 days of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation in 72 mesial root canals of mandibular molars, the root canals were distributed into 2 groups (n = 36) according to the systems used for preparation: ProDesign S and Reciproc. The groups were redistributed according to the limit of apical preparation (n = 11): (a) 1 mm up to the apical foramen (TL-1); (b) at the apical foramen (TL = 0); (c) 1 mm beyond the apical foramen (TL + 1). After preparation, the remaining biofilm adhered to the dentin walls at the apical third was removed by sonication. The aliquots of bacterial suspension released, and the irrigating solution leaked through the apical foramen during preparation were plated for colony-forming units (CFUs) counting. Data were statistically assessed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (α = 5%). Both systems promoted decontamination of the apical third, regardless the limit of apical preparation (p > 0.05). A larger quantity of bacteria was extruded from the root canals prepared 1 mm beyond the apical foramen, regardless the instrumentation kinematics (p < 0.05). The apical third of the root canal was efficiently decontaminated after preparation, regardless the instrumentation kinematics and the apical limit. However, a larger quantity of bacterial extrusion was observed when preparation was performed beyond the anatomical root canal limits.

Indexed as

Dental InstrumentsDental Pulp CavityDisinfectionEnterococcus faecalisRoot Canal PreparationTooth ApexBiofilmsBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMolarApical limitBacterial extrusionBiofilmDisinfectionInstrument kinematic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.