ArticleEye and vision (London, England)2025
Comparison of the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique without versus with an autologous blood clot for treating macular hole-associated retinal detachment.
Article in Eye and vision (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- OVD-assisted press injection in gasless surgery for sectorial inverted internal limiting membrane flap stabilization.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Novel dual-layer internal limiting membrane flap with superior-inferior coverage combined with autologous blood application for large macular hole: anatomical and functional outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the anatomical and functional outcomes of macular hole-associated retinal detachment (MHRD) after vitrectomy using the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique with autologous blood clot (ABC).
methodsThis retrospective observational study included 80 eyes with MHRD that underwent vitrectomy with ILM flap without (46 eyes) or with ABC (34 eyes). Fundus photography and optical coherence tomography were evaluated. The pre- and postoperative best-corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) and BCVA improvement were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe MH closure rates after initial surgery were similar in the ILM flap group and ILM flap with ABC group [40 (87%) vs. 29 (85%) eyes, respectively]. The proportion of eyes with hyperreflective bridging tissue (HBT) was lower in the ILM flap group than ILM flap with ABC group [13 (32%) vs. 16 (55%) eyes, P = 0.060]. The postoperative improvement in BCVA was significantly better in the ILM flap group (P = 0.027). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that preoperative BCVA was positively associated with postoperative improvement in BCVA (β = 0.638, P = 0.000), while the ILM flap with ABC technique was negatively associated with postoperative improvement in BCVA (β = - 0.299, P = 0.039, adjusted r
conclusionsThe inverted ILM flap technique alone resulted in better foveal configurations and visual outcomes than the ILM flap technique combined with ABC in patients with MHRD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.