ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Assessment of fully quantitative and simplified methods for analysis of [
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parametric imaging of dynamic long-axial-field-of-view PET scans: Technical challenges, statistical insights and clinical applications.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Review
- Kinetic modelling of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET in pancreaticobiliary lesions: distinguishing cancer from pancreatitis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Repeatability of semi-quantitative [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to validate simplified methods for quantifying [
methodsTen patients with pancreatobiliary cancer underwent a 90-min dynamic PET/CT scan using a long axial field of view system. Arterial blood samples were used to establish calibrated plasma-input function from both continuous arterial sampling and image-derived input function (IDIF). Lesional [
resultsOne patient was excluded due to discontinued scan acquisition and missing arterial sampling. Thirteen tumoral lesions and 11 non-tumoral lesions were included. A reversible 2-tissue-compartment model showed most preferrable fits for all types of [
conclusionImage-based TBR and SUVmean at 60-70 min p.i are suitable for quantifying [
trial registrationEudraCT, EudraCT 2022-001867-29. Registered 02 November 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39743615What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.