Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39743557›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2025

Endothelial cells as key players in cerebral small vessel disease.

Ronja Kremer, Anna Williams, Joanna Wardlaw

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Brain endothelial GαEBioMedicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ronja KremerCentre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0695-0581
Anna WilliamsCentre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6329-382X
Joanna WardlawUK Dementia Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. joanna.wardlaw@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9812-6642

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) is a vascular disorder that increases the risk of stroke and dementia and is diagnosed through brain MRI. Current primary prevention and secondary treatment of SVD are focused on lifestyle interventions and vascular risk factor control, including blood pressure reduction. However, these interventions have limited effects, a proportion of individuals with sporadic SVD do not have hypertension, and SVD shows strong familial and genetic underpinnings. Here, we describe the increasing evidence that cerebral endothelial cell dysfunction is a key mechanism of SVD. Dysfunctional endothelial cells can cause cerebral blood vessel dysfunction, alter blood-brain barrier integrity and interfere with cell-cell interactions in the neuro-glial-vascular unit, thereby causing damage to adjacent brain tissue. Endothelial cells in SVD may become dysfunctional through intrinsic mechanisms via genetic vulnerability to SVD and/or via extrinsic factors such as hypertension, smoking and diabetes. Drugs that act on endothelial pathways are already looking promising in clinical trials, and understanding their action on endothelial cells and the surrounding brain may lead to the development of other therapies to limit disease progression and improve outcomes for individuals with SVD.

Indexed as

BrainCerebral Small Vessel DiseasesEndothelial CellsAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.