ArticleJournal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons2024
Long-term clinical study of fixed prosthetic rehabilitation using one-piece narrow-diameter implants: a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of one-piece narrow-diameter implants (NDIs), with diameters of 2.5 mm and 3.0 mm, and to investigate the factors that affect marginal bone loss (MBL) around these implants. Materials and Methods: This study analyzed patients who were treated with 2.5 mm and 3.0 mm MS SA narrow ridge implants (Osstem Implant) at the Section of Dentistry in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2007 to 2022 and had more than 6 years of follow-up data. MBL was measured using periapical radiographs. Age, sex, implant location, timing of implant placement and loading, placement depth, guided bone regeneration (GBR), fixture diameter, type of implant prosthesis, and opposing dentition type were investigated in relation to MBL. The implant survival rate was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with MBL. All analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.1.0 for Microsoft Windows; R Foundation). Results: Twenty-five patients with 40 NDIs were included in this study. The mean observation period after implant function was 10.5 years (range, 6.1 to 14.0 years), and the survival rate of the NDIs was 95.1% at the implant level and 96.0% at the patient level. The average amount of MBL was 0.44±0.57 mm. The only factor that showed a significant association with MBL was the presence of GBR ( Conclusion: Within the limitations of a retrospective evaluation, NDIs have demonstrated optimal clinical outcomes over a long period in areas in which anatomical structures are limited. MBL around the NDI also showed clinically acceptable results, and a correlation with MBL was observed in cases in which a bone graft was performed. Further studies with a larger number of implants over extended periods are needed in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.