ArticleIndian pacing and electrophysiology journal
Leadless pacemaker implantation in challenging scenarios: A case report series of patients with mechanical tricuspid valves.
Article in Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe advancement of medical technology has introduced leadless pacemakers (LPMs) as a significant innovation in cardiac pacing, offering potential advantages over traditional ventricular transvenous pacemakers. This report explores the application of LPMs in two patients with complex valvular histories, particularly those with mechanical tricuspid valves. CASE REPORTS: The first case involves a 60-year-old male with a history of rheumatic heart disease and triple valve replacement who developed a high-grade AV block. Due to significant RV pacing, a single-chamber VVI pacemaker using the Micra Transcatheter Pacing System was successfully implanted, navigating the mechanical tricuspid valve with stable pacing parameters. The second case describes a 70-year-old female with HIV, diabetes, hypothyroidism, and multiple valve surgeries presenting with syncope and dyspnea. Given her complex medical history and recurrent conduction issues, the Micra pacemaker was chosen. Despite initial resistance, successful deployment was achieved at the lower septum with acceptable pacing thresholds. DISCUSSION: LPMs offer a promising alternative for patients with mechanical tricuspid valves, eliminating the risks associated with transvenous leads. The Micra system's minimally invasive approach and stable performance in these challenging cases suggest its potential viability in high-risk patients with complex valvular conditions.
conclusionThese cases demonstrate the feasibility of LPM implantation through mechanical tricuspid valves; however, given the associated risks, careful evaluation and meticulous procedural planning are essential before considering this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.