Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39742680›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology2025

Cervical cancer incidence and trends among women aged 15-29 years by county-level economic status and rurality - United States, 2007-2020.

Radhika Agarwal, Jessica B King, Sameer V Gopalani, Virginia Senkomago

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Human papillomavirus infection and screening strategies.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Radhika AgarwalDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: radhika.agarwal@emory.edu.
Jessica B KingDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Sameer V GopalaniDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, United States.
Virginia SenkomagoDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVariations in cervical cancer incidence rates and trends have been reported by sociodemographic characteristics. However, research on economic characteristics is limited especially among younger women in the United States.

methodsWe analyzed United States Cancer Statistics data to examine age-standardized cervical cancer incidence rates among women aged 15-29 years during 2007-2020. We used an index-based county-level economic classification to rank counties in the top 25 %, middle 25 %-75 %, and bottom 25 %. We assessed differences in incidence using rate ratios and trends using annual percent changes (APCs) from joinpoint regression. Due to impact from the COVID-19 pandemic, trend analysis excluded 2020 data. Analyses were conducted during August-October 2023.

resultsDuring 2007-2020, incidence rates were lower in the top 25 % counties economically than the bottom 25 % or middle 25 %-75 % (1.6 vs 2.1 vs 1.9 per 100,000, respectively). Rates were higher in nonmetropolitan than metropolitan counties across economic groups. Overall, rates declined in all county-level economic strata, especially in the bottom 25 % during 2015-2019 (APC -10.6 %). Rates appeared to decrease in metropolitan counties and women of all races across economic categories. decreases were most evident in the top 25 % of non-Hispanic White women during 2016-2019 and nonmetropolitan counties during 2017-2019.

conclusionsIn women aged 15-29 years, declining rates of cervical cancer during 2007-2019 across county-level economic strata may partly reflect effects of human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical cancer screening. Further observed differences by race and rurality may help inform efforts to increase implementation of preventive measures in populations with the highest burden.

Indexed as

Economic StatusRural PopulationUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultCOVID-19FemaleHumansIncidencePapillomavirus VaccinesUnited StatesYoung AdultPapillomavirus VaccinesCervical cancerCervical cancer incidenceCervical cancer screeningCervical cancer trendsHPV vaccination

Identifiers

PMID39742680
PMCPMC11962738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.