Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39742657›Full record

Observational studyThe Journal of surgical research2025

Using Machine Learning to Predict Weight Gain in Adults: an Observational Analysis From the All of Us Research Program.

Dawda Jawara, Kate V Lauer, Manasa Venkatesh, Lily N Stalter, Bret Hanlon, Matthew M Churpek, Luke M Funk

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Journal of surgical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dawda JawaraDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Kate V LauerDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Manasa VenkateshDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Lily N StalterDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Bret HanlonDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Matthew M ChurpekDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Luke M FunkDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Surgery, William S. Middleton Memorial VA, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: funk@surgery.wisc.edu.

Funding

TRAINING IN NUTRITIONT32DK007665 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GUY E GROBLEWSKI, Chi- Liang Eric Yen · 1993 to 2026
$9.2M
Impact of Financing on Outcomes of Methadone MaintenanceR01DA015060 · NIDA · RMC RESEARCH CORPORATION · PI DECK, DENNIS D · 2002 to 2004
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015060NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionObesity, defined as a body mass index ≥30 kg/m

methodsThe All of Us dataset was used to identify adults between 18 and 70 ys old with weight measurements 2 y apart between 2008 and 2022. Patients with a history of cancer, bariatric surgery, or pregnancy were excluded. Demographics, vital signs, laboratory results, comorbidities, and survey data (Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical and mental health scores) were included as model parameters. Elastic net and XGBoost machine learning models were developed with and without survey data to predict ≥10% total body weight gain within 2 y. The data were split into a training sample (60%) and a testing sample (40%), and parameters were tuned using 10-fold cross-validation. Performance was compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs).

resultsOur cohort consisted of 34,715 patients (mean [SD] age 50.9 [13.4] y; 45.7% White; 55.3% female). Over a 2-y span, 10.4% of the cohort gained ≥10% total body weight. AUCs were 0.677 [95% DeLong confidence interval 0.665-0.688] for elastic net and 0.706 [0.695-0.717] for XGBoost. Incorporation of survey data did not improve predictability, with AUCs of 0.681 [0.669-0.692] and 0.705 [0.694-0.716], respectively.

conclusionsOur machine learning weight gain prediction models had modest performance that was not improved by survey data. The addition of other All of Us variables, including genomic data, may be informative in future studies.

Indexed as

Machine LearningObesityWeight GainAdolescentAdultAgedBody Mass IndexElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung AdultAdultAll of usMachine learningModelsObesityPredictionWeight gain

Identifiers

PMID39742657
PMCPMC11911080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.