Observational studyThe Journal of surgical research2025
Using Machine Learning to Predict Weight Gain in Adults: an Observational Analysis From the All of Us Research Program.
Observational study in The Journal of surgical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Opportunities and Challenges in Using National EHR Networks for AI in Learning Health Systems.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Supervised machine learning algorithms for the classification of obesity levels using anthropometric indices derived from bioelectrical impedance analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Response Regarding: Using Machine Learning to Predict Weight Gain in Adults: An Observational Analysis From the All of Us Research Program.The Journal of surgical research · 2025Article
- International expert consensus on the current status and future prospects of artificial intelligence in metabolic and bariatric surgery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionObesity, defined as a body mass index ≥30 kg/m
methodsThe All of Us dataset was used to identify adults between 18 and 70 ys old with weight measurements 2 y apart between 2008 and 2022. Patients with a history of cancer, bariatric surgery, or pregnancy were excluded. Demographics, vital signs, laboratory results, comorbidities, and survey data (Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical and mental health scores) were included as model parameters. Elastic net and XGBoost machine learning models were developed with and without survey data to predict ≥10% total body weight gain within 2 y. The data were split into a training sample (60%) and a testing sample (40%), and parameters were tuned using 10-fold cross-validation. Performance was compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs).
resultsOur cohort consisted of 34,715 patients (mean [SD] age 50.9 [13.4] y; 45.7% White; 55.3% female). Over a 2-y span, 10.4% of the cohort gained ≥10% total body weight. AUCs were 0.677 [95% DeLong confidence interval 0.665-0.688] for elastic net and 0.706 [0.695-0.717] for XGBoost. Incorporation of survey data did not improve predictability, with AUCs of 0.681 [0.669-0.692] and 0.705 [0.694-0.716], respectively.
conclusionsOur machine learning weight gain prediction models had modest performance that was not improved by survey data. The addition of other All of Us variables, including genomic data, may be informative in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.