ReviewDNA repair2025
Mechanisms of tandem duplication in the cancer genome.
Review in DNA repair, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The BRCA1 coiled-coil domain is dispensable for suppression of tandem duplications and tolerance of FANCM loss.The EMBO journal · 2026Article
- TONSL emerges as a key barrier to prevent large tandem duplications.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026Article
- TONSL suppresses polymerase theta-dependent tandem duplications through chromatin-guided repair.Nature communications · 2026Article
- TONSOKU prevents the formation of large tandem duplications and restrains ATR-WEE1 checkpoint activation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- New twist on BRCA1-mediated DNA recombination repair and tumor suppression.Trends in cell biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tandem duplications (TD) are among the most frequent type of structural variant (SV) in the cancer genome. They are characterized by a single breakpoint junction that defines the boundaries and the size of the duplicated segment. Cancer-associated TDs often increase oncogene copy number or disrupt tumor suppressor gene function, and thus have important roles in tumor evolution. TDs in cancer genomes fall into three classes, defined by the size of duplications, and are associated with distinct genetic drivers. In this review, we survey key features of cancer-related TDs and consider possible underlying mechanisms in relation to stressed DNA replication and the 3D organization of the S phase genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.