Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39742388›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2025

Managing Friends and Foes: Sanctioning Mutualists in Mixed-Infection Nodules Trades off With Defense Against Antagonists.

Camille E Wendlandt, Saumik Basu, Angeliqua P Montoya, Paige Roberts, Justin D Stewart, Allison B Coffin, David W Crowder, E Toby Kiers, Stephanie S Porter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Camille E WendlandtSchool of Biological Sciences Washington State University Vancouver Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7901-3442
Saumik BasuDepartment of Entomology Washington State University Pullman Washington USA.
Angeliqua P MontoyaSchool of Biological Sciences Washington State University Vancouver Washington USA.
Paige RobertsSchool of Biological Sciences Washington State University Vancouver Washington USA.
Justin D StewartAmsterdam Institute for Life and Environment (A-LIFE), Section Ecology & Evolution Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Allison B CoffinDepartment of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience Washington State University Vancouver Washington USA.
David W CrowderDepartment of Entomology Washington State University Pullman Washington USA.
E Toby KiersAmsterdam Institute for Life and Environment (A-LIFE), Section Ecology & Evolution Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Stephanie S PorterSchool of Biological Sciences Washington State University Vancouver Washington USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful plant growth requires plants to minimize harm from antagonists and maximize benefit from mutualists. However, these outcomes may be difficult to achieve simultaneously, since plant defenses activated in response to antagonists can compromise mutualism function, and plant resources allocated to defense may trade off with resources allocated to managing mutualists. Here, we investigate how antagonist attack affects plant ability to manage mutualists with sanctions, in which a plant rewards cooperative mutualists and/or punishes uncooperative mutualists. We studied interactions among wild and domesticated pea plants, pea aphids, an aphid-vectored virus (Pea Enation Mosaic Virus, PEMV), and mutualistic rhizobial bacteria that fix nitrogen in root nodules. Using isogenic rhizobial strains that differ in their ability to fix nitrogen and express contrasting fluorescent proteins, we found that peas demonstrated sanctions in both singly-infected nodules and mixed-infection nodules containing both strains. However, the plant's ability to manage mutualists in mixed-infection nodules traded off with its ability to defend against antagonists: when plants were attacked by aphids, they stopped sanctioning within mixed-infection nodules, and plants that exerted stricter sanctions within nodules during aphid attack accumulated higher levels of the aphid-vectored virus, PEMV. Our findings suggest that plants engaged in defense against antagonists suffer a reduced ability to select for the most beneficial symbionts in mixed-infection tissues. Mixed-infection tissues may be relatively common in this mutualism, and reduced plant sanctions in these tissues could provide a refuge for uncooperative mutualists and compromise the benefit that plants obtain from mutualistic symbionts during antagonist attack. Understanding the conflicting selective pressures plants face in complex biotic environments will be crucial for breeding crop varieties that can maximize benefits from mutualists even when they encounter antagonists.

Indexed as

aphidslegume‐rhizobia mutualismmutualism managementPea Enation Mosaic Virussanctionssymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID39742388
PMCPMC11683190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.