Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39742373›Full record

ReviewThe breast journal2024

Breast Desmoid Tumours: A Review of the Literature.

Mike Wu, Thomas Michael Hughes, Senarath Edirimanne, Nicholas Ngui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The breast journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mike WuJames Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4810, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-7544-5861
Thomas Michael HughesAustralian National University School of Medicine and Psychology, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1493-486X
Senarath EdirimanneSydney Adventist Hospital Breast and Soft Tissue Oncology Services, Wahroonga, NSW 2076, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5928-2597
Nicholas NguiAustralian National University School of Medicine and Psychology, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9674-4404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast desmoid tumour is a rare type of benign breast disease that presents like malignancy. Current guidelines are based on limited evidence derived from case reports and small case series and recommend resection with microscopically-negative margin (R0). There is a high risk of recurrence despite negative surgical margins. A review of the published cases of breast desmoid since 2000 was conducted using Medline and Embase to descriptively analyse the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of this rare disease. After screening, we identified 46 patients from 39 articles. Most cases did not have risk factors, but 17/46 (37%) had prior procedures on the ipsilateral breast. Mammography was able to detect 65% of the cases, ultrasound detected 74%, and both CT and MRI detected all cases when used. Preoperative diagnosis was best performed using core needle biopsy showing typical histology and positive beta-catenin staining. 42/46 cases underwent definitive surgical management, with 8 cases of recurrence. Recurrence occurred within 3 years of the initial surgery. Median time of recurrence was 8 months, and the median follow-up of the recurrence-free patients was 12 months. There were no predictive factors identified for recurrence. There were 7 cases treated with a nonsurgical modality, with 3 showing at least a partial response.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDesmoid TumorsAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMammographyMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, Local

Identifiers

PMID39742373
PMCPMC11259505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.