Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39742366›Full record

SynthesisThe breast journal2024

Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Compared to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Node-Positive HR+, HER2- Breast Cancer (Nodal pCR and the Rate of ALND): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mahtab Vasigh, Mohammadreza Karoobi, Austin D Williams, Fasika Molla Abreha, Richard J Bleicher, Seyed Mostafa Meshkati Yazd, Tahereh Shamsi, Ramesh Omranipour, Ahmad Elahi, David Farhat and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The breast journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mahtab VasighDepartment of Surgical Oncology Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3150-9400
Mohammadreza KaroobiDepartment of Surgery Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-2300-6838
Austin D WilliamsDepartment of Surgical Oncology Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2299-3061
Fasika Molla AbrehaDepartment of Surgery Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Richard J BleicherDepartment of Surgical Oncology Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7343-932X
Seyed Mostafa Meshkati YazdDepartment of Surgery Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-5112-9854
Tahereh ShamsiDepartment of Surgery Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ramesh OmranipourBreast Disease Research Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4785-281X
Ahmad ElahiBreast Disease Research Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-2243-9578
David FarhatDepartment of Surgery Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-1111-9447
Mehran HabibiDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine Hofstra/Northwell University, Hempstead, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2944-4388

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancers have the lowest response to neoadjuvant therapy of all subtypes. The role of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in clinically node-positive (cN+), HR+, HER2- patients is evaluated in this meta-analysis. Methods: This study was performed between January 2010 and August 2022. We evaluated the node pathologic complete response (pCR) and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) rates after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET). Results: 18,037 HR+, HER2-, cN+ stage II and stage III breast cancer patients within eleven studies received neoadjuvant treatments. 3,707 (20.6%) patients received NET and 14,330 (79.4%) received NAC. The average age of the NET patients was higher than that of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) patients (64.1 versus 47.6 years old, Conclusion: The rate of node pCR was lower among cN+ patients who received NET compared to the NAC group. The rate of ALND among cN+ NET patients was lower than the NAC group, revealing more patients with residual nodal disease do not get ALND in the NET group. Further prospective studies are required to compare survival outcomes as a more reliable surrogate.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesLymph Node ExcisionNeoadjuvant TherapyAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAxillaChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMiddle AgedReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID39742366
PMCPMC11315960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.