ArticleThe breast journal2024
Digital Self-Management Intervention Paths for Early Breast Cancer Patients: Results of a Pilot Study.
Article in The breast journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Digital Behavior Change Interventions to Promote Physical Activity and Reduce Sedentary Behavior Among Survivors of Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite excellent prognosis of early breast cancer, the patients face problems related to decreased quality of life and mental health. There is a need for easily available interventions targeting modifiable factors related to these problems. The aim of this study was to test the use of a new digital supportive intervention platform for early breast cancer patients. Results: Thirty-two patients followed the empowerment path, 43 the nutrition path, and 75 the exercise path. On a scale of 1-5, most of the participants (mean = 3.4; SD 0.815) found the interventions helpful and would have recommended testing and supportive interventions to their peers (mean = 3.70; SD 0.961). During the 10-week intervention period, the mean number of log-ins to the empowerment path was 3.69 (SD = 4.24); the nutrition path, 4.32 (SD = 2.891); and the exercise path, 8.33 (SD = 6.293). The higher number of log-ins to the empowerment (rho = 0.531, Conclusion: Patients' attitudes towards the interventions were positive, but they used them far less than was recommended. A randomized trial would be needed to test the effect of interventions on patients' QoL and mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.