ArticleJournal of pain research2024
Construction of Pain Management Strategies After Hepatectomy: Evidence Summary and Delphi Study.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of an evidence-based pressure injury prevention care bundle for home-care settings: a systematic review and Delphi study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Effect of the Evidence-Based and Multidisciplinary Pain Management Program in Patients After Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Comment on Pain Management Strategies After Hepatectomy, a Narrative Review of Therapeutic Options [Letter].Journal of pain research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and summarize pain management strategies after hepatectomy for liver cancer based on the best evidence summary, and to improve the strategy of the Delphi study. Methods: According to the "6S" evidence pyramid model, the database was systematically searched, with a search deadline of December 2023. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening and quality evaluation. Relevant evidence on pain management was extracted and integrated. Relevant evidence for pain management formed a preliminary strategy through a one-day, face-to-face meeting. Subsequently, a Delphi process was performed to improve the strategy. The scientific soundness of the Delphi method was expressed by the effective response rate, authority coefficient (Cr), and coordination coefficient. The coordination of expert opinions was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV) and Kendall's coefficient (W). Cr should be above 0.700 and the coefficient of variation (CV) should be below 0.25. Data analysis was performed using SPSS V.25.0. Results: A total of 14 studies were included, and we summarized 13 first-level items and 48 second-level items by two rounds of Delphi. The effective response rate of the two rounds of Delphi was 100.00%, and the authority coefficient of the experts was 0.832. The coefficients of variation were 0.00-0.41 and 0.05-0.17, respectively. The Kendall's W values for the two rounds were 0.114-0.222 (p<0.05). Conclusion: Pain management strategy after hepatectomy is scientific and applicable. We plan to translate this into a plan and confirm its feasibility in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.