ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024
Resources, support, and integration as potential barriers and facilitators to the implementation of blended therapy in the routine care of inpatients: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk Factors for Noninitiation and Dropout in Blended Therapy in Inpatient Psychiatric Patients: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Observational
- Barriers and Facilitators for the Implementation of an Online Portal in Hospital Mental Health Care: Implementation Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- The present and future of blended care: current research and introduction to the B-FIT framework.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- E-Mental Health Interventions in Inpatient Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While research on blended therapy (BT), i.e. the combination of face-to-face and digital treatment, has grown rapidly, integrating BT into routine practice remains limited, especially in inpatient settings. This study seeks to investigate the potential barriers healthcare providers and patients are confronted with in implementing BT to inpatients. Here, a retrospective, explorative qualitative research design was employed to gain insights into the experiences of healthcare professionals and inpatients in a real-world clinical setting. Specifically, we utilized semi-structured interviews to explore three key aspects: time resources, organizational support, and integration. A total of 11 therapists and 6 patients were interviewed. To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to examine the implementation of blended therapy in the routine care of inpatients. We found that therapists emphasized several barriers including overwhelming workloads with insufficient time allocated for the work with the digital tools, inadequate time adjustments, a lack of ongoing training, and the necessity for a well-defined concept and setting of how to implement blended therapy. Interestingly, fewer barriers were reported by patients, who viewed the e-mental health platform as a valuable addition to their standard therapy. They also judged guidance and integration by their therapists as satisfactory and appreciated the adaptability offered in managing their workload in a flexible setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.