Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39742314›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Longitudinal volumetric analysis of

Felix Streckenbach, Hanna Schön, Julia König, Marcus Frank, Inga Langner, Oliver Stachs, Anika Jonitz-Heincke, Sönke Langner, Tobias Lindner, Jana Schätzel

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Felix StreckenbachInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pediatric and Neuroradiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Hanna SchönInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pediatric and Neuroradiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Julia KönigDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Marcus FrankMedical Biology and Electron Microscopy Centre, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Inga LangnerDepartment of Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Oliver StachsDepartment Life, Light and Matter, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Anika Jonitz-HeinckeDepartment Life, Light and Matter, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Sönke LangnerInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pediatric and Neuroradiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Tobias LindnerInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pediatric and Neuroradiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Jana SchätzelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The chicken egg, with its Materials and methods: In total, 64 chicken eggs were examined using a 7 T UHF-MRI scanner, acquiring T2-weighted anatomical images of the entire egg from developmental day 1 to 16 (D1-D16). Four eggs were scanned each developmental day, and the volumes of the yolk/yolk sac, amniotic fluid, and embryo were quantitatively assessed. Results: UHF-MRI facilitated the Discussion: UHF-MRI allows

Indexed as

animal modelchicken embryoin ovo cavitiesin ovo developmentultra-high field MRI

Identifiers

PMID39742314
PMCPMC11685116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.