Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39742283›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

In-depth analysis of serum antibodies against Epstein-Barr virus lifecycle proteins, and EBNA1, ANO2, GlialCAM and CRYAB peptides in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Nicole Vasilenko, Maria P Tieck, Tanja Michel, Sonja Schembecker, Patricia Schwarz, Anna Guenther, Christoph Ruschil, Sven Poli, Ulf Ziemann, Antje Giede-Jeppe and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. EBNA1Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Toward a global research agenda for preventing multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nicole Vasilenko *Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Maria P Tieck *Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Tanja MichelNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
Sonja SchembeckerHertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Patricia SchwarzDepartment of Neurology & Stroke, Eberhard-Karls, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Anna GuentherNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
Christoph RuschilHertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Sven PoliHertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ulf ZiemannHertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Antje Giede-JeppeHertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Gisela GabernetDepartment of pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Alex DulovicNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
Markus C KowarikHertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A strong association between multiple sclerosis (MS) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has been established but the exact role of EBV in MS remains controversial. Recently, molecular mimicry between EBNA1 and specific GlialCAM, CRYAB and ANO2 peptides has been suggested as a possible pathophysiological mechanism. The aim of this study was to analyse anti-EBV antibodies in MS patients against (I) EBV lifecycle proteins, (II) putative cross-reactive peptides, and (III) during treatment. Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, 258 serum samples were included consisting of EBV-negative (n = 25) and EBV-positive (n = 36) controls, 192 MS samples including untreated relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) with and without relapses, secondary progressive MS (SPMS) and primary progressive MS (PPMS) patients, and 106 patients on 8 different treatment regimens. IgG and IgM antibody titers against EBV docking/fusion proteins (gp350, gh/gp42, gh/gL/gp42), immediate early antigen (BZLF1), early antigens (EA p85, EA P138, EA P54), capsid antigens (VCA P18, VCA P23, VCA gp125) and late antigens (EBNA1) were measured. Specific EBNA1 and GlialCAM, CRYAB and ANO2 peptides were synthesized and also incorporated in our custom magnetic bead based multiplex assay. Results: We observed significantly elevated IgG antibody titers in EBV-positive controls, RRMS with and without relapse, SPMS and PPMS patients for all lifecycle antigens except for several early antigens when compared to EBV-negative controls. Significantly higher IgG antibody titers were observed in RRMS patients for fusion proteins and EBNA1 peptides when compared to EBV-positive controls. An MS specific response was observed for ANO2 but not for GlialCAM or CRYAB. No significant treatment effects or a specific IgM response were detectable. Conclusion: The MS-specific, differential antibody response to EBV antigens confirms an altered immunological response to EBV in MS patients. EBV reactivation does not appear to play an important role in MS pathogenesis and no differential antibody signatures were observed between MS disease phases. The MS-specific anti-ANO2 antibody response suggests a potential role for EBNA1 as an antigenic driver, although the exact role of anti-ANO2 antibodies needs to be determined. The precise pathophysiological role of EBV in MS remains uncertain and requires further investigation.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralEpstein-Barr Virus Nuclear AntigensHerpesvirus 4, HumanMultiple SclerosisAdultAgedCross ReactionsCross-Sectional StudiesEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAntibodies, ViralEBV-encoded nuclear antigen 1Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear AntigensImmunoglobulin Galpha B crystallin (CRYAB)anoctamin 2 (ANO2)EBV nuclear antigen type 1 (EBNA1)Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)glial cell adhesion molecule (GlialCAM)multiple sclerosis (MS)

Identifiers

PMID39742283
PMCPMC11685087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.