Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39742249›Full record

ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2024

Deep Learning-Based Carotid Plaque Ultrasound Image Detection and Classification Study.

Hongzhen Zhang, Feng Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hongzhen ZhangPrecision Medicine Innovation Institute, Anhui University of Science and Technology, 232001 Huainan, Anhui, China.
Feng ZhaoGeneral Surgery Department, The First Hospital of Anhui University of Science & Technology (Huai Nan First People's Hospital), 232002 Huainan, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to develop and evaluate the detection and classification performance of different deep learning models on carotid plaque ultrasound images to achieve efficient and precise ultrasound screening for carotid atherosclerotic plaques. Methods: This study collected 5611 carotid ultrasound images from 3683 patients from four hospitals between September 17, 2020, and December 17, 2022. By cropping redundant information from the images and annotating them using professional physicians, the dataset was divided into a training set (3927 images) and a test set (1684 images). Four deep learning models, You Only Look Once Version 7 (YOLO V7) and Faster Region-Based Convolutional Neural Network (Faster RCNN) were employed for image detection and classification to distinguish between vulnerable and stable carotid plaques. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and area under curve (AUC), with Results: We constructed and compared deep learning models based on different network architectures. In the test set, the Faster RCNN (ResNet 50) model exhibited the best classification performance (accuracy (ACC) = 0.88, sensitivity (SEN) = 0.94, specificity (SPE) = 0.71, AUC = 0.91), significantly outperforming the other models. The results suggest that deep learning technology has significant potential for application in detecting and classifying carotid plaque ultrasound images. Conclusions: The Faster RCNN (ResNet 50) model demonstrated high accuracy and reliability in classifying carotid atherosclerotic plaques, with diagnostic capabilities approaching that of intermediate-level physicians. It has the potential to enhance the diagnostic abilities of primary-level ultrasound physicians and assist in formulating more effective strategies for preventing ischemic stroke.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecarotid plaquedeep learning techniquesischemic strokevulnerability

Identifiers

PMID39742249
PMCPMC11683696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.