Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39742225›Full record

ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2024

Long-term Follow-up Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main.

Zlatko Mehmedbegovic, Vladan Vukcevic, Sinisa Stojkovic, Branko Beleslin, Dejan Orlic, Miloje Tomasevic, Miodrag Dikic, Milorad Tesic, Dejan Milasinovic, Srdjan Aleksandric and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Zlatko MehmedbegovicDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6400-1828
Vladan VukcevicDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8590-1152
Sinisa StojkovicDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5784-9377
Branko BeleslinDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9452-8241
Dejan OrlicDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6030-9322
Miloje TomasevicDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9514-3674
Miodrag DikicDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Milorad TesicDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Dejan MilasinovicDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Srdjan AleksandricDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6903-4477
Vladimir DedovicDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8954-996X
Milorad ZivkovicDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Stefan JuricicDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3045-5263
Dario JelicDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Djordje MladenovicDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Goran StankovicDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9414-0885

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Elective unprotected left main (ULM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has long-term mortality rates comparable to surgical revascularization, thanks to advances in drug-eluting stent (DES) design, improved PCI techniques, and frequent use of intravascular imaging. However, urgent PCI of ULM culprit lesions remains associated with high in-hospital mortality and unfavourable long-term outcomes, including DES restenosis and stent thrombosis (ST). This analysis aimed to examine the long-term outcomes and healing of DES implanted in ULM during primary PCI using high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging. Methods: A total of 15 consecutive patients undergoing long-term OCT follow-up of ULM primary PCI from a high-volume center were included in this analysis. During the index primary PCI all subjects underwent angio-guided DES implantation, and follow-up was uneventful in all but one subject who had a non-target PCI lesion. The primary endpoint was the percentage of covered, uncovered, and malappossed stent struts at long-term follow-up. Secondary endpoints included quantitative and qualitative OCT measurements. For the left main bifurcation, a separate analysis was performed for three different segments: left main (LM), polygon of confluence (POC) and distal main branch (dMB), in all cases. Results: The average follow-up interval until OCT was 1580 ± 1260 days. Despite aorto-ostial stent protrusions in 40% of patients, optimal image quality was achieved in 93.3% of cases. There were higher rates of malapposed (11.4 ± 16.6 vs. 13.1 ± 8.3 vs. 0.3 ± 0.5%; Conclusions: Long-term OCT examination of DES implanted during primary PCI for culprit ULM lesions demonstrated high rates of incomplete strut coverage, late malapposition, and high subclinical DES failure rates. These negative OCT results highlight the need for image optimization strategies during primary PCI to improve DES-related long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

long-term follow-upOCTprimary PCIstent malappositionstrut endothelizationunprotected left main

Identifiers

PMID39742225
PMCPMC11683725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.