ArticleHealth and human rights2024
Protecting Distress Migrants' Right to Health in Ecuador: Are Legal Commitments Being Fulfilled?
Article in Health and human rights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A landscape analysis of perinatal mental health delivery among stakeholders in Ecuador and Peru.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ecuador's legal framework promises equitable access to health care for all. However, gaps in coverage are being exacerbated by the nearly 500,000 Venezuelan distress migrants remaining in the country over the past decade. The purpose of our study was to examine how the Ecuadorian health system responds to the needs of migrant populations arriving in poor health conditions. We conducted 28 key informant interviews with government officials, health care providers, and representatives of international cooperation agencies and migrant organizations, and analyzed documents from a related Constitutional Court sentence. We find that despite Ecuador's commitments, significant gaps exist in the implementation of protection mechanisms for distress migrants. Systemic obstacles, such as documentation requirements and exclusion from benefits granted by law, remain. Discriminatory practices and concerns about the allocation of limited resources can further impede access. The Constitutional Court case underscores how the judicialization of health may prompt the government to address distress migrants' right to health and document its progress. Ultimately, more comprehensive approaches are needed to promote a more equitable health system that addresses the specific experiences and needs of distress migrants in Ecuador.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39742209PMC11683570What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.