Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39742168›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Use of Internet/Application-Based E-consults by General Practitioners in Japan to Resolve Patients' Problems: A Descriptive Observational Study.

Taku Harada, Toru Morikawa, Hiroki Furuya, Tomoki Sato, Minami Kakehi, Hiroki Yamada, Taro Shimizu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Taku HaradaDepartment of General Medicine, Nerima Hikarigaoka Hospital, Nerima, JPN.
Toru MorikawaDepartment of General Medicine, Nara City Hospital, Nara, JPN.
Hiroki FuruyaResearch and Development, TANAAKK, Inc., New York, USA.
Tomoki SatoDepartment of Pediatrics, Hiroshima City Funairi Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, JPN.
Minami KakehiCenter of Postgraduate Clinical Training, General Hospital Minamiseikyo Hospital, Nagoya, JPN.
Hiroki YamadaResearch, Medii, Inc., Shinjuku, JPN.
Taro ShimizuDepartment of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, Mibu, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Electronic consultations (e-consults) refer to digital health technologies that enhance clinical information sharing and improve patients' access to expert healthcare providers. This study aims to describe the current utilization of the Internet/application-based e-consult system and to assess how effectively it resolves clinical questions. Methods Participants were general practitioners (GPs) who had installed the e-consult platform on their personal computers or cell phones. Hospital specialists who responded to the e-consults were previously registered on our e-consult platform and also participated in the study. We have developed and implemented an Internet/application-based e-consult system that GPs can use on their personal computers in Japan. In this descriptive study, GPs used the e-consult platform via an Internet/application to consult hospital specialists. The study period was from May 1, 2020, to October 31, 2021. The outcome measure was the resolution rate, calculated by dividing the number of cases resolved solely through e-consults by the total number of e-consult cases. Another outcome measure was the number of cases in which a plan was determined using e-consults. Other outcome measures were GP satisfaction, assessed using a 5-point Likert scale for e-consults, the number of chats required for a hospital specialist to respond, and the time from the GP's initial question to the hospital specialist's first response. Results Of the 329 e-consult cases identified, 91 conducted by GPs were included in the final analysis. The number of cases resolved using only e-consults was 47, resulting in a resolution rate of 52% in the study. The minor specialists exhibited the highest resolution rate using e-consults alone. The number of cases where a plan was determined using e-consults was 83, accounting for 91% of the total 91 cases. The level of GP satisfaction with the e-consult process was high, with a median satisfaction score of 5 on a 5-point Likert scale. Most e-consults received their initial response within two hours. The number of chats required for hospital specialists to respond was very low, with a median of only one chat being necessary. Conclusion The Internet/application-based e-consult system enabled GPs to address a wide range of medical problems. Further studies with large samples are necessary, even though these results serve as an important benchmark for future research on e-consults in Japan.

Indexed as

applicationdigital health technologye-consultgeneral practitionerinternal medicineinternet

Identifiers

PMID39742168
PMCPMC11688166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.