ArticleCureus2024
Use of Internet/Application-Based E-consults by General Practitioners in Japan to Resolve Patients' Problems: A Descriptive Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Use of a Note-Taking App by Japanese Resident Physicians: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Electronic consultations (e-consults) refer to digital health technologies that enhance clinical information sharing and improve patients' access to expert healthcare providers. This study aims to describe the current utilization of the Internet/application-based e-consult system and to assess how effectively it resolves clinical questions. Methods Participants were general practitioners (GPs) who had installed the e-consult platform on their personal computers or cell phones. Hospital specialists who responded to the e-consults were previously registered on our e-consult platform and also participated in the study. We have developed and implemented an Internet/application-based e-consult system that GPs can use on their personal computers in Japan. In this descriptive study, GPs used the e-consult platform via an Internet/application to consult hospital specialists. The study period was from May 1, 2020, to October 31, 2021. The outcome measure was the resolution rate, calculated by dividing the number of cases resolved solely through e-consults by the total number of e-consult cases. Another outcome measure was the number of cases in which a plan was determined using e-consults. Other outcome measures were GP satisfaction, assessed using a 5-point Likert scale for e-consults, the number of chats required for a hospital specialist to respond, and the time from the GP's initial question to the hospital specialist's first response. Results Of the 329 e-consult cases identified, 91 conducted by GPs were included in the final analysis. The number of cases resolved using only e-consults was 47, resulting in a resolution rate of 52% in the study. The minor specialists exhibited the highest resolution rate using e-consults alone. The number of cases where a plan was determined using e-consults was 83, accounting for 91% of the total 91 cases. The level of GP satisfaction with the e-consult process was high, with a median satisfaction score of 5 on a 5-point Likert scale. Most e-consults received their initial response within two hours. The number of chats required for hospital specialists to respond was very low, with a median of only one chat being necessary. Conclusion The Internet/application-based e-consult system enabled GPs to address a wide range of medical problems. Further studies with large samples are necessary, even though these results serve as an important benchmark for future research on e-consults in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.