Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39742159›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Discordant Susceptibilities of Enterobacterales to Different Tetracycline Classes.

Hannah Flores, Paul Luethy, James B Doub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah FloresInfectious Diseases, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, USA.
Paul LuethyPathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
James B DoubInternal Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When bacteria are tetracycline- or doxycycline-resistant, the ability of these bacteria to be susceptible to the other tetracyclines is not well defined. Consequently, gaining knowledge about the ability to infer Enterobacterales susceptibility to minocycline and third-generation tetracycline antibiotics from surrogates is vital. In this study, we show that tigecycline may be a reasonable surrogate from which clinicians can infer omadacycline and eravacycline susceptibilities, even in the presence of doxycycline and tetracycline resistance. Yet, minocycline susceptibility cannot be inferred from third-generation tetracyclines used as surrogates when Enterobacterales is resistant to doxycycline and tetracycline.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceenterobacteralesminocyclineomadacyclinetetracycline

Identifiers

PMID39742159
PMCPMC11687707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.