ArticleThe chronicle of mentoring & coaching2024
Reasons for Faculty Attrition, Assessed by Latent Class Analysis.
Article in The chronicle of mentoring & coaching, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Mentors on Overall Faculty Experience and Reason for Leaving.The chronicle of mentoring & coaching · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Almost 60% of early career faculty at Schools of Medicine (SOM) leave within ten years of hire. National data indicate that inadequately mentored faculty, particularly those from underrepresented minority backgrounds, are less likely to be retained. The role of mentoring in faculty retention is inadequately studied. The study objective was to analyze factors associated with SOM faculty retention, using the University of New Mexico SOM exit interview data. Analyses were based on exit surveys with SOM faculty resigning, not retiring, during the timeframe 2017-2023 (N=429). LCA was conducted using items related to primary/secondary reasons for leaving. Item response probabilities were examined to assess item associations with latent classes. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between latent class and overall experience at the SOM and the likelihood of returning to the institution. A three latent class (LC) model was selected based on reasons to leave. LC1 cited factors that were both extrinsic and intrinsic to the current workplace (lure of a greater career opportunity and low current salary respectively). LC2 primarily cited extrinsic reasons to leave (personal/family matters), and LC3 primarily cited reasons intrinsic to the current workplace (work environment and leadership). LC2 was associated with a significantly higher rating of overall experience and likelihood of considering returning (p<0.001 for both analyses). Exiting faculty may be classified into three qualitatively different subgroups or latent classes. Our study findings may guide mentors, supervisors, and organizations to identify class-specific customized interventions to help retain faculty, including those from disadvantaged groups, and thereby, help address the ongoing attrition of the nation's biomedical workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39742115PMC11687422What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.