ArticleJADA foundational science2024
Relaxation mechanisms in low-stress polymer networks with alternative chemistries.
Article in JADA foundational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Low-stress resin-based composites (RBCs) are available to the clinician, some using stress relaxation mechanisms on the basis of network reconfiguration, modulated photopolymerization, or chain transfer reactions. This study investigated those materials in terms of their overall stress relaxation and their relationship with polymerization kinetics and compared them with an experimental low-stress thiourethane (TU) material. Methods: Experimental composites (bisphenol-A-diglycidyl dimethacrylate, urethane dimethacrylate, and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate [50:30:20 mass ratio]; 70% barium aluminosilicate filler; camphoroquinone, ethyl-4-dimethylaminobenzoate, and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol [0.2:0.8:0.2% by mass]) with or without TU oligomer (synthesized in-house) and commercial composites (SureFil SDR Flow+ Posterior Bulk Fill Flowable Base [SDR Flow+] [Dentsply Sirona], Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative [3M ESPE], and Filtek Supreme Ultra Universal Restorative [3M ESPE]) were tested. Polymerization kinetics (near-infrared) and polymerization stress (Bioman) were evaluated during light-emitting diode photoactivation at 100 mW/cm Results: The kinetic profiles of all materials differed substantially, including more than a 2-fold difference in the rate of polymerization between TU-modified composites and SDR Flow+. TU-modified RBCs also showed more than a 2-fold higher conversion at the onset of deceleration vs the experimental control and commercial materials. RBCs that used stress reduction mechanisms showed at least a 34% reduction in polymerization stress compared with the controls and significantly reduced the amount of early-onset stress buildup. SDR Flow+ and the TU-modified RBCs showed the greatest amount of viscoelastic stress relaxation postpolymerization. Conclusions: The novel TU-modified materials showed similar or improved performance compared with commercial low-stress RBCs, showing that chain transfer may be a promising strategy for stress reduction, both during polymerization and after polymerization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.