ArticleJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Comparative evaluation of coronally advanced flap and semilunar coronally repositioned flap, using platelet-rich fibrin in Miller's Class I recession defects: A randomized clinical trial.
Article in Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative clinical evaluation of triangular flap design and trapezoidal flap design with advanced platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of human gingival recession: A randomized clinical trial.Journal of Indian Society of PeriodontologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For a periodontist, treating recession is always a proud moment and a challenging task. The current trial aimed at comparing and clinically evaluating semilunar coronally repositioned flap (SCRF) and coronally advanced flap (CAF) procedures combined with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in the management of Miller's Class I recession defects. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six recession sites were randomly divided into the CAF or SCRF groups. Gingival thickness (GT), root coverage percentage (%RC), plaque index (PI), gingival bleeding index (GBI), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were measured at baseline and 3 and 6 months. Recession height (RH), recession width (RW), and width of keratinized tissue (WKT) were also measured. With significance set at Results: Intragroup comparison showed a statistical significance for all the clinical parameters i.e. RW ( Conclusion: Root coverage is better in CAF with PRF than SCRF with PRF, in the treatment of gingival recession. PRF helped in soft-tissue healing and increased in GT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.