ArticleGlobal health & medicine2024
Use of oral allylestrenol in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion: A retrospective clinical trial.
Article in Global health & medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA), defined as two or more clinically confirmed pregnancies that end before 20-24 weeks of gestation, encompasses both embryonic and fetal losses and is a significant clinical challenge. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of allylestrenol (AT) and progesterone in improving pregnancy outcomes in RSA. From June 2021 to June 2024, 480 participants were randomly assigned to an AT, Progesterone, or Control group. Key outcomes included early pregnancy rates, ongoing pregnancies with fetal heart activity, live birth rates after 24 weeks, and pregnancy loss before 24 weeks. Results indicated significantly higher pregnancy rates at 6-8 weeks in both the Allylestrenol (71.8%) and Progesterone groups (76.2%) compared to the Control group (57.5%). At 12 weeks, ongoing pregnancies with fetal heart activity were higher in the Allylestrenol (65%) and Progesterone groups (64%) versus the Control group (52.5%). Both treatment groups had higher live birth rates (60% and 60.6%) compared to the Control group (45%). Pregnancy loss before 24 weeks was lower in both treatment groups (31.8% and 33.1%) compared to the Control group (38.7%). No significant adverse reactions were observed, indicating good safety profiles for both treatments. These findings suggest that both treatments effectively improve pregnancy outcomes in cases of RSA with satisfactory safety, supporting their potential clinical use. However, further research is needed to explore their long-term effects and broader applicability in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.