ArticleDigital health
Exploring factors affecting patient satisfaction in online healthcare: A machine learning approach grounded in empathy theory.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Empathy between doctors and patients is crucial in enhancing patient satisfaction with medical consultations. This study, grounded in empathy theory, employs natural language processing and machine learning algorithms to explore the factors influencing patient satisfaction in online healthcare services, particularly the impact of doctor-patient empathy. Methods: Utilizing the three dimensions of the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy, seven variables were extracted from patient-doctor dialogs as independent variables, with patient satisfaction as the dependent variable. Employing machine learning algorithms, a classification model was constructed to identify the best-fitting model for exploring the pivotal factors influencing patient satisfaction in online medical services. The optimal model was then chosen to investigate the essential factors impacting patients' satisfaction with online healthcare. Results: A total of 7586 data points were collected, with 5447 consultation dialogs (71.8%) receiving a satisfactory rating from patients. LightGBM emerged as the best-performing model, achieving an F1 score of 0.78 and an area under the curve value of 0.81. Factors within the Standing in Patient's Shoes and Perspective Taking dimensions were identified as key determinants of patient satisfaction in online healthcare services. Conclusion: This study broadens the conventional scope of applying empathy theory, signifying its crucial role in cultivating doctor-patient empathy within the realm of online healthcare and elevating the overall quality of medical services. The findings indicate that two pivotal factors influencing patients' satisfaction with online healthcare are doctors' perceived competence and ability to empathize, understanding patients' perspectives, and offering assistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.