ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Design and dosimetric characterization of a transportable proton minibeam collimation system.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bibliometric analysis of global research trends in spatially fractionated radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Roadmap for the implementation of particle minibeam therapy.Medical physics · 2026Review
- The future is not always uniform: rethinking radiotherapy through spatial fractionation.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- The research beamlines at the Dresden proton therapy facility: available infrastructure and experimental capabilities.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy has shown to widen the therapeutic window compared to conventional radiation treatment in pre-clinical studies. The underlying biological mechanisms, however, require more research. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and characterize a mechanical collimation setup capable of producing 250µm wide proton minibeams with a center-to-center distance of 1000µm. Methods: To find the optimal arrangement Monte Carlo simulations were employed using the Geant4 toolkit TOPAS to maximize key parameters such as the peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) and the valley dose rate. The experimental characterization of the optimized setup was carried out with film dosimetry at the University Proton Therapy beamline in Dresden and the proton beamline of the University of Washington Medical Center in Seattle with 150MeV and 50.5MeV, respectively. A microDiamond detector (PTW, Freiburg, Germany) was utilized at both beamlines for online proton minibeam dosimetry. Results: A PVDR of 10 was achieved in Dresden and a PVDR of 14 in Seattle. Dosimetry measurements were carried out with EBT3 films at a depth of 5mm in a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) phantom. When comparing film dosimetry with the microDiamond, excellent agreement was observed in the valleys. However, the peak dose showed a discrepancy of approximately 10% in the 150MeV beam and 20% in the 50.5MeV beam between film and microDiamond. Discussion: The characteristics of the minibeams generated with our system compares well with those of other collimated minibeams despite being smaller. The deviations of microDiamond measurements from film readings might be subject to the diamond detector responding differently in the peak and valley regions. Applying previously reported correction factors aligns the dose profile measured by the microDiamond with the profile acquired with EBT3 films in Dresden. Conclusion: The novel proton minibeam system can be operated independently of specific beamlines. It can be transported easily and hence used for inter-institutional comparative studies. The quality of the minibeams allows us to perform
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.