ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Assessing ChatGPT responses to common patient questions regarding total ankle arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07012577 (Observational Study on the Accuracy and Completeness of General Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Therapeutic Recommendations for Failed or Painful Total Hip Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Observational Study on the Accuracy and Completeness of General Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Therapeutic Recommendations for Failed or Painful Total Hip Arthroplasty
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Structured Critical Review and Descriptive Evidence Map of Validation, Uncertainty, and Workflow Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Physician Perspectives on ChatGPT-4o as a Patient Resource for Abdominal Cancer Surgeries: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative Quality Assessment of Artificial Intelligence in Patient Education on Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Therapy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Gemini 1.5 Flash provides the most reliable content while ChatGPT-4o offers the highest readability for patient education on meniscal tears.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- ChatGPT models provide higher-quality but lower-readability responses than Google Gemini regarding anterior shoulder instability, with no added benefit of the orthopaedic expert plugin.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- A Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Platforms in the Utility of Answering Frequently Asked Questions About Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2025Article
- Examining the effectiveness of ChatGPT responses to frequently asked questions by individuals with postural disorders.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025Article
- Assessing ChatGPT responses to common patient questions regarding total ankle arthroplasty.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- ChatGPT as a source of surgical information: Evaluation of responses to patient questions on hallux rigidus fusion.Digital healthArticle
- Evaluating ChatGPT-4 as a digital patient education tool in anesthesia: A multi-rater quality assessment.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Artificial Intelligence is becoming increasingly integrated into healthcare, making it essential to assess its potential as a reliable information source for patient queries in the ambit of orthopaedic surgery. In literature, it is being employed in foot and ankle surgery and total hip arthroplasty. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ability of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) version 3.5 to give accurate, complete and comprehensive responses to the most common questions which are usually asked by the patient to the surgeon regarding total ankle arthroplasty. Methods: Ten most common questions were selected by two ankle surgeons and then ChatGPT was used to answer these questions. The responses were analyzed using an accuracy score and the modified DISCERN score to assess clarity. WordCalc software package (educational-level indices) was used to assess the readability of the responses. Results: Most of ChatGPT's responses were considered excellent not requiring clarification or satisfactory requiring minimal clarification. Indeed, the accuracy score was 2, suggesting that the overall responses were satisfactory requiring minimal clarification, and DISCERN score mean was 51, which is considered good-fair. Conclusions: ChatGPT demonstrates potential as a tool for responding to common patient questions related to total ankle arthroplasty, offering clear and mostly accurate information. While its current performance is based on the available literature, ongoing advancements in artificial intelligence may further enhance its utility in healthcare communication. However, further studies are required to evaluate its role more precisely in patient information and clinical settings. Levels of Evidence: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.