Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39741910›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025

Meniscal extrusion: Proposal for a novel qualitative classification.

Simone Perelli, Pietro Conte, Nicola Pizza, Rodolfo Morales-Avalos, Elizaveta Kon, Alberto Grassi, Stefano Zaffagnini, Joan Carles Monllau

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Meniscal extrusion: Multiple theories, one clinical challenge.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026
    Article
  3. Can we Predict the Outcomes of Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy?Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simone PerelliICATKnee, Institut Català de Traumatologia i Medicina de l'Esport (ICATME)-Hospital Universitari Dexeus Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0010-024X
Pietro ConteICATKnee, Institut Català de Traumatologia i Medicina de l'Esport (ICATME)-Hospital Universitari Dexeus Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5425-0652
Nicola PizzaICATKnee, Institut Català de Traumatologia i Medicina de l'Esport (ICATME)-Hospital Universitari Dexeus Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.
Rodolfo Morales-AvalosDepartment of Physiology, Laboratory of Biomechanics, School of Medicine Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León Monterrey Mexico.
Elizaveta KonIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano Milano Italy.
Alberto GrassiClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy.
Stefano ZaffagniniClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica II IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy.
Joan Carles MonllauICATKnee, Institut Català de Traumatologia i Medicina de l'Esport (ICATME)-Hospital Universitari Dexeus Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meniscal extrusion (ME), defined as the radial displacement of the meniscal body outside the margins of the tibial plateau, has been seen as an independent and relevant predictor of intra-articular knee degeneration. Nonetheless, available classifications for ME are exclusively quantitative assessments not considering the context in which extrusion is identified. Indeed, ME can be the result of several different conditions spanning from acute tears to chronic degeneration and its definition cannot be only dependent on the numeric calculation of the radial displacement of the meniscal body. Furthermore, growing evidence supports the existence of a paraphysiological ME resulting from joint loading, limb malalignment, anatomical abnormalities of the meniscal attachments to the femur and tibia or a nonpathological finding after meniscal allograft transplantation. It is therefore clear that an exclusively quantitative assessment of ME cannot be sufficient since this condition can develop in such different clinical scenarios. For this reason, a novel qualitative classification for ME is proposed, differentiating between three distinct conditions: a paraphysiological ME, a pathological ME and ME related to degenerative conditions. Furthermore, a comprehensive review of the present literature has been conducted to report the most relevant and updated evidence on the topic highlighting the difference in the clinical management of each different category. Level of Evidence: Not applicable.

Indexed as

degenerativeextrusionkneemeniscal extrusionmeniscusosteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID39741910
PMCPMC11685843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.