Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39741904›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2024

A Clinically Oriented Review of New Antipsychotics for Schizophrenia.

Maria Luca, Antonina Luca, Alessandro Serretti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria LucaCentre for Addiction, Adrano-Bronte, Adrano (CT), Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5935-8283
Antonina LucaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Kore University of Enna, Enna (EN), Italy.
Alessandro SerrettiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Kore University of Enna, Enna (EN), Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4363-3759

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Currently available antipsychotics, mainly targeting the dopaminergic pathway, fail to address the complexity of schizophrenic symptoms and can lead to burdening adverse events. The need for innovative pharmacological options remains critical and research is now focusing on the development of non-dopaminergic antipsychotics. This review aims to summarize the current literature on the most promising non-dopaminergic new APs (muscarinic agonists, Trace Amine Associated Receptor 1 agonists, Glycine Transporter Type 1 inhibitors and 5-HT2A antagonists) and provide a clinically oriented overview of their efficacy, safety and potential use in schizophrenia. Methods: A preliminary search was conducted through the Clinical Trials Database, in order to identify a representative (at late-stage clinical development) for each pharmacological class. The following drugs were selected: bitopertin (GlyT-1 inhibitor), pimavanserin (5-HT2A antagonist), ulotaront (TAAR1 agonist) and xanomeline-trospium (muscarinic agonist). Then, a literature search was conducted through PubMed, in order to retrieve current literature focusing on the efficacy and safety of these drugs. Results: The clinical development of bitopertin and pimavanserin was halted despite the early promises. Xanomeline-trospium chloride was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of schizophrenia. Ulotaront showed mixed results, although analysis is ongoing. Conclusion: The findings of our review indicate that research on the treatment of schizophrenia is gaining momentum. However, it is crucial to remain cautious about over-optimism, as many compounds have failed to deliver the expected results. A balanced approach is recommended when dealing with new APs, whether under investigation or approved. In the latter case, clinicians should carefully evaluate the cost-benefit ratio. Since several agents are still being tested, there is hope that additional data may present new therapeutic opportunities.

Indexed as

adverse eventsantipsychoticscognitive symptomsnegative symptomsschizophreniaunmet needs

Identifiers

PMID39741904
PMCPMC11687306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.