ReviewNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2024
A Clinically Oriented Review of New Antipsychotics for Schizophrenia.
Review in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review and network meta-analysis of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of xanomeline plus trospium chloride compared with eight oral antipsychotics for the acute treatment of schizophrenia.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of selected second and third generation antipsychotics on cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Systematic review and network meta-analysis.International clinical psychopharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Role of Glial Trace Amine Associated Receptor 1 (TAAR1) and Microbiota in Schizophrenia.Neurochemical research · 2025Review
- New pharmacological approaches in the treatment of schizophrenia.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Currently available antipsychotics, mainly targeting the dopaminergic pathway, fail to address the complexity of schizophrenic symptoms and can lead to burdening adverse events. The need for innovative pharmacological options remains critical and research is now focusing on the development of non-dopaminergic antipsychotics. This review aims to summarize the current literature on the most promising non-dopaminergic new APs (muscarinic agonists, Trace Amine Associated Receptor 1 agonists, Glycine Transporter Type 1 inhibitors and 5-HT2A antagonists) and provide a clinically oriented overview of their efficacy, safety and potential use in schizophrenia. Methods: A preliminary search was conducted through the Clinical Trials Database, in order to identify a representative (at late-stage clinical development) for each pharmacological class. The following drugs were selected: bitopertin (GlyT-1 inhibitor), pimavanserin (5-HT2A antagonist), ulotaront (TAAR1 agonist) and xanomeline-trospium (muscarinic agonist). Then, a literature search was conducted through PubMed, in order to retrieve current literature focusing on the efficacy and safety of these drugs. Results: The clinical development of bitopertin and pimavanserin was halted despite the early promises. Xanomeline-trospium chloride was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of schizophrenia. Ulotaront showed mixed results, although analysis is ongoing. Conclusion: The findings of our review indicate that research on the treatment of schizophrenia is gaining momentum. However, it is crucial to remain cautious about over-optimism, as many compounds have failed to deliver the expected results. A balanced approach is recommended when dealing with new APs, whether under investigation or approved. In the latter case, clinicians should carefully evaluate the cost-benefit ratio. Since several agents are still being tested, there is hope that additional data may present new therapeutic opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.