Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39741895›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Navigating Samarinda's climate: A comparative analysis of rainfall forecasting models.

Mislan, Andrea Tri Rian Dani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

MislanDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Mulawarman University.
Andrea Tri Rian DaniDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Mulawarman University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling rainfall data is critical as one of the steps to mitigate natural disasters due to weather changes. This research compares the goodness of traditional and machine learning models for predicting rainfall in Samarinda City. Monthly rainfall data was recapitulated by the Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics Agency from 2000 to 2020. The traditional models used are Exponential Smoothing and ARIMA, while the machine learning model is a Neural Network. Data is divided into training and testing with a proportion of 90:10. Evaluation of goodness-of-fit using Root Mean Squared Error Prediction (RMSEP). The research results show that the Neural Network has better accuracy in predicting rainfall in Samarinda. Forecasting results indicate that monthly rainfall trends suggest that the months with the highest rainfall occur around November to March. This research provides important implications for developing a warning system for hydrometeorological disasters in Samarinda. The superior points in this research are:•Modeling rainfall data in Samarinda City using several forecasting methods: Exponential Smoothing, ARIMA, and Neural Network.•The Neural-Network algorithm used is Backpropagation with data standardization.•Information about predicted high rainfall can be used to issue early warnings of floods or landslides. Disaster mitigation through policies to regulate water discharge based on rainfall predictions to prevent floods and drought.

Indexed as

ARIMAExponential smoothingForecastingNeural networkTime series modelingTraditional and Machine Learning Models in Forecasting: Exponential Smoothing, ARIMA, NN

Identifiers

PMID39741895
PMCPMC11683286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.