ArticleMethodsX2025
Navigating Samarinda's climate: A comparative analysis of rainfall forecasting models.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global, regional, and national burden of acute hepatitis (1990-2021): a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease in 2021.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modeling rainfall data is critical as one of the steps to mitigate natural disasters due to weather changes. This research compares the goodness of traditional and machine learning models for predicting rainfall in Samarinda City. Monthly rainfall data was recapitulated by the Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics Agency from 2000 to 2020. The traditional models used are Exponential Smoothing and ARIMA, while the machine learning model is a Neural Network. Data is divided into training and testing with a proportion of 90:10. Evaluation of goodness-of-fit using Root Mean Squared Error Prediction (RMSEP). The research results show that the Neural Network has better accuracy in predicting rainfall in Samarinda. Forecasting results indicate that monthly rainfall trends suggest that the months with the highest rainfall occur around November to March. This research provides important implications for developing a warning system for hydrometeorological disasters in Samarinda. The superior points in this research are:•Modeling rainfall data in Samarinda City using several forecasting methods: Exponential Smoothing, ARIMA, and Neural Network.•The Neural-Network algorithm used is Backpropagation with data standardization.•Information about predicted high rainfall can be used to issue early warnings of floods or landslides. Disaster mitigation through policies to regulate water discharge based on rainfall predictions to prevent floods and drought.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.