Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39741892›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Non-carcinogenic health risks assessment of bioaerosols

Azhar Siddique, Kashif Rasool

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Azhar SiddiqueQatar Environment and Energy Research Institue (QEERI), Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.
Kashif RasoolQatar Environment and Energy Research Institue (QEERI), Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioaerosols, pose potential health risks, yet quantitative assessments of non-carcinogenic risks from bioaerosol inhalation are limited. This study introduces a novel approach for assessing non-carcinogenic health risks using bioaerosol exposure data. The method employs the Average Daily Dose and Hazard Quotient (HQ) metrics, adapted from US Environmental Protection Agency guidelines, with the Reference Dose (RfD) based on thresholds from the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. This study utilizes a time-weighted approach, considering age-specific inhalation rates and body weights, to enhance the precision of lifetime exposure assessments. This methodology was applied to data collected over one year across multiple locations in Qatar, assessing seasonal and site-specific variations in risk. Results indicate generally low health risks, with HQ values below 1 for most sites and seasons. However, the study identified elevated HQ values at highly active sites during the dry summer, suggesting potential health concerns that need urgent attention. The proposed framework offers a replicable approach for evaluating bioaerosol-related health risks across diverse environments.•Novel adaptation of HQ-based risk assessment for bioaerosols in Qatar, incorporating a time-weighted approach.•Evaluation of seasonal and site-specific exposure dynamics.•Designed for replicability in different environmental conditions.

Indexed as

Air qualityAssessment of non-carcinogenic health risk of Bioaerosols inhalation exposureBioaerosolsHealth risk assessmentHuman healthUrban pollution

Identifiers

PMID39741892
PMCPMC11683212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.