ArticleACS omega2024
Bidirectional Modulation on Electroporation Induced by Membrane Tension Under the Electric Field.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pulsed Electric Fields for Emerging Single-Cell Bioprocessing in Food Applications: Electropermeabilization Mechanisms and Design Principles.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Electroporation in lipid vesicles by varying PEG-grafted lipids in their membranes: an experimental and simulation study.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Distinct Structural Responses of Lipid Bilayers to Horizontal and Vertical Electric Fields.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Article
- Optimizing electroporation via pulse modulation: a molecular dynamics study.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2025Article
- Fast-Rising Electric Pulses by Reducing Membrane Tension for Efficient Membrane Electroporation.Membranes · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Small-Molecule Candidates as Modulators of M-Type KInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroporation ablation is a minimally invasive nonthermal ablation technology that is applied to tumor ablation therapy. Given the varied morphologies of tumor cells, when an electric field is applied to the cell membrane surface, the direction of the electric field produces various angles with normal to the tangential plane of the cell membrane. In this study, we investigated the impact of cell morphology on membrane electroporation characteristics by adjusting the angle of the electric field relative to the cell membrane by using molecular dynamics simulations. The results show that the bidirectional modulation of cell membrane surface tension induced by Coulomb force can be triggered, allowing the electroporation effect to be regulated, by varying the angle between the electric field direction and the normal to the membrane. Electric field angles below 45° decreased phospholipid membrane surface tension, facilitating pore formation; angles above 45° enhanced the surface tension, elevating the energy barrier for pore opening and thus inhibiting pore formation. Furthermore, during the initial stage of membrane pore formation, water molecules penetrated the lipids, which aligned with the electric field and affected the pore tilt. The bidirectional modulation of the electric field in electroporation demonstrated that reversing the angle of the electric field is a potentially effective electroporation ablation protocol for improving the effectiveness of clinical cancer treatments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.