ArticleACS omega2024
Release of Crystalline Silica Nanoparticles during Engineered Stone Fabrication.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimentally recreated workplace environments contain submicron crystalline silica particles, including ultrafine particles, which have been identified in the mediastinal lymph nodes of construction workers.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2026Article
- The Combined Role of Silanols and Oxidative Stress in Determining Engineered Stone Dust Toxicity.ACS organic & inorganic Au · 2026Article
- Physico-chemical features and membranolytic activity of dust from low or no crystalline silica engineered stone with implications for toxicological assessment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inhalation exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) during the fabrication of engineered stone-based kitchen countertops has been on the rise in recent years and has become a significant occupational health problem in the United States and globally. Little is known about the presence of nanocrystalline silica (NCS), i.e., particles below 100 nm. We present a methodology to quantify the crystalline silica content in the sub-100 nm size fraction of the aerosol released during engineered stone fabrication using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Aerosol was generated in a test chamber designed per EN 1093-3 and sampled using cascade impactors. XRD and FTIR analysis showed the presence of both α-quartz (15-60%) and cristobalite (10-50%) polymorphs in all size fractions. With increasing particle size, the cristobalite content increased. Seventy percent of the total aerosol mass in the sub-100 nm fraction was found to be crystalline silica, qualitatively confirmed by electron diffraction and electron energy loss spectroscopy. The presence of other minerals was detected in all size fractions; no polymeric resin binder was detected in the sub-100 nm fraction. Although the sub-100 nm fraction was about 1% of the aerosol mass, it accounted for 4-24% of the aerosol surface area based on the total lung deposition. If the surface area is a more relevant exposure metric, the assessment of the efficacy of current engineering control systems using mass as an exposure metric may not provide adequate protection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.