ArticleJournal of medical signals and sensors2024
Computed Tomography Scan and Clinical-based Complete Response Prediction in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Journal of medical signals and sensors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical target volume radiomics from planning CT for pretreatment response prediction in rectal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), followed by total mesorectal excision. Examining the response to treatment is one of the most important factors in the follow-up of patients; therefore, in this study, radiomics patterns derived from pretreatment computed tomography images in rectal cancer and its relationship with treatment response measurement criteria have been investigated. Methods: Fifty patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who were candidates for nCRT and surgery were included. The information obtained from the tumor surgical pathology report, including pathological T and N, the degree of tumor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion along with radiomics characteristics to each patient, was assessed. Modeling with disturbed forest model was used for radiomics data. For other variables, Shapiro-Wilk, Chi-Square, and Pearson Chi-square tests were used. Results: The participants of this study were 50 patients (23 males [46%] and 27 females [54%]). There was no significant difference in the rate of response to neoadjuvant treatment in between age and gender groups. According to the modeling based on combined clinical and radiomics data together, area under the curves for the nonresponders and complete respond group (responder group) was 0.97 and 0.99, respectively. Conclusion: Random forests modeling based on combined radiomics and clinical characteristics of the pretreatment tumor images has the ability to predict the response or non-response to neoadjuvant treatment in LARC to an acceptable extent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.