ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Advances and challenges of prenatal interventions for fetal tachyarrhythmias.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fetal tachyarrhythmias: current knowledge for clinical practice.Translational pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is estimated that 1%-2% of pregnancies are complicated by fetal arrhythmias, with most arrhythmias considered benign and not requiring further treatment or intervention. However, persistent tachyarrhythmias can lead to fetal heart failure, preterm birth, stillbirth, and increased risks during the perinatal period. Therefore, timely treatment during pregnancy is often necessary. Currently, prenatal treatment for fetal tachyarrhythmias (FTs) is primarily drug based, aiming to restore normal fetal heart rate, prevent or reverse fetal heart failure, and avoid adverse outcomes such as preterm birth and stillbirth. Despite decades of clinical experience, the lack of prospective, multicenter randomized clinical trials on the safety and efficacy of drugs means that there is still no universally accepted prenatal treatment regimen for FTs, and treatment relies on series of observational studies or clinical cases. Moreover, all drug treatments carry potential risks to the mother, fetus, and pregnancy, hence the need for more clinical diagnostic and therapeutic experience to provide more clinical evidence for prenatal treatment of FTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.